| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
84
   |
Posted - 2011.11.16 14:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Firstly, your tears are delicious and will be added to the ample collection we have going.
Have you collected the tears from your own OP yet? Plenty to be had there.
The war dec system needs a complete overhaul so that it stops being the grief tool it currently is. In the mean time I suggest you find other more willing targets to play with.
In the case that your fun is had with raging and upsetting people then I suggest you drown yourself in your own rage tears, figuratively speaking of course. As I said, there are plenty to be had from yourself. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 21:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:There seems to be a lack of reading comprehension in this thread by a fair number of people. We (Dec Shield) are not declaring wars against anyone, ever. We're absorbing wars from other people. We usually have 5-10 incoming wars. Everyone here making arguments that we should "move to low/nullsec" or stop griefing carebears doesn't even make sense since we're not doing any fighting ourselves. We're the ones saving these people.
It's not what you're writing that I question. It's how you're writing. And it seems quite clear that you are upset with CCP over the recent ruling with the war dec mechanics. So upset, in fact, that you've made it your own personal mission to "abuse" this mechanic because I suspect you think that will get it changed back to the status quo.
So yes, the argument for you to go pick on players that do want to fight is quite appropriate in this case. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:So yes, the argument for you to go pick on players that do want to fight is quite appropriate in this case. If you don't want to fight, don't plant a POS. In fact, don't create a corp. Doing either means you're in it for the competitive advantage, and robbing you of that advantage should always be an option.
OR, if you don't like the rules being laid out by the game designers then don't play their game? See? We both can be witty. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:You see? Another kid who thinks he is entitled to be 100% invulnerable in Highsec.
Nope. Just another "kid" that thinks the war dec mechanics need a complete overhaul. And a kid that really doesn't care much for sadists.
Quote:These are the people who CCP are listening to now. Its their game now. In a year or two this will be Hello Kitty Online (Paintable pink ships here we come)
Man, it's gonna be awesome! Will you then play with me? |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
87
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:We raise awareness by abusing this loophole loudly in public. I really hope CCP changes things to prevent what we're doing.
The Zerg Overmind wrote:There seems to be a lack of reading comprehension in this thread by a fair number of people... Everyone here making arguments that we should "move to low/nullsec" or stop griefing carebears doesn't even make sense since we're not doing any fighting ourselves. We're the ones saving these people.
The only comprehension problems seem to be coming from you. |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 00:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:The Zerg Overmind wrote:We raise awareness by abusing this loophole loudly in public. I really hope CCP changes things to prevent what we're doing. The Zerg Overmind wrote:There seems to be a lack of reading comprehension in this thread by a fair number of people... Everyone here making arguments that we should "move to low/nullsec" or stop griefing carebears doesn't even make sense since we're not doing any fighting ourselves. We're the ones saving these people. The only comprehension problems seem to be coming from you. Everything you say should be accompanied by a side of cheese. No really, you're on a roll here. Three posts in a row. /golfClap. Please don't let me stand in your way, keep going. I'm assuming that you think I've contradicted myself because you've double quoted me as if I had done so... I said I hope CCP changes game mechanics to prevent wardec alliance hopping abuse/tower saving (like we're offering to people). And the other quote is me saying that we were weren't doing any fighting ourselves. How do these two quotes demonstrate a lack of comprehension by me? I think you only reinforced my original sentiment regarding you.
Ok then. I will go ahead and spell out your inconsistency because you don't seem to have the brain power yourself:
As I said before, it's not what you're saying, but how you're saying it. On the one hand you claim to be the carebear's "savior" and doing what you do with the honest-to-goodness intention of promoting safety in hi sec and whatever else bullshit it is you're selling, and on the other hand stating that you're abusing the system because you don't like the safe haven it creates for carebears.
Is it clear now :)?
And your claim that you "aren't doing any fighting", well, that's just more bullshit to fuel your frivolous crusade against hi sec and carebears. Why don't you come clean on what angle it is that benefits you from allowing an absolute pay-to-grief system and then maybe we can sit down and have an honest heart-to-heart conversation about it? Whaddya say?
Or we could just continue to be silly. You claim you're a carebear savior who doesn't ever PVP and I'll claim that I'm a hardcore bad-ass PVPer that hates everything carebear  (YARR is it?). |
| |
|